Comparing the Cost of ERW and Seamless Pipes

When it comes to choosing the right type of Pipe for a project, cost is often a significant factor to consider. Two popular options in the market are ERW (Electric Resistance Welded) pipes and seamless pipes. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, but one crucial aspect that many people focus on is the cost.

NPS	OD	WT
INCH	MM	SCH10	SCH20	SCH30	STD	SCH40	SCH60	XS	SCH80	SCH100	SCH120	SCH140	SCH160
1/2″	21.3	2.11		2.41	2.77	2.77		3.73	3.73				4.78
3/4″	26.7	2.11		2.41	2.87	2.87		3.91	3.91				5.56
1″	33.4	2.77		2.9	3.38	3.38		4.55	4.55				6.35
1.1/4″	42.2	2.77		2.97	3.56	3.56		4.85	4.85				6.35
1.1/2″	48.3	2.77		3.18	3.68	3.68		5.08	5.08				7.14
2″	60.3	2.77		3.18	3.91	3.91		5.54	5.54				8.74
2.1/2″	73	3.05		4.78	5.16	5.16		7.01	7.01				9.53
3″	88.9	3.05		4.78	5.49	5.49		7.62	7.62				11.13
3.1/2″	101.6	3.05		4.78	5.74	5.74		8.08	8.08
4″	114.3	3.05		4.78	6.02	6.02		8.56	8.56		11.13		13.49
5″	141.3	3.4			6.55	6.55		9.53	9.53		12.7		15.88
6″	168.3	3.4			7.11	7.11		10.97	10.97		14.27		18.26
8″	219.1	3.76	6.35	7.04	8.18	8.18	10.31	12.7	12.7	15.09	18.26	20.62	23.01
10″	273	4.19	6.35	7.8	9.27	9.27	12.7	12.7	15.09	18.26	21.44	25.4	28.58
12″	323.8	4.57	6.35	8.38	9.53	10.31	14.27	12.7	17.48	21.44	25.4	28.58	33.32
14″	355.6	6.35	7.92	9.53	9.53	11.13	15.09	12.7	19.05	23.83	27.79	31.75	35.71
16″	406.4	6.35	7.92	9.53	9.53	12.7	16.66	12.7	21.44	26.19	30.96	36.53	40.19
18″	457.2	6.35	7.92	11.13	9.53	14.27	19.05	12.7	23.83	39.36	34.93	39.67	45.24
20″	508	6.35	9.53	12.7	9.53	15.09	20.62	12.7	26.19	32.54	38.1	44.45	50.01
22″	558.8	6.35	9.53	12.7	9.53		22.23	12.7	28.58	34.93	41.28	47.63	53.98
24″	609.6	6.35	9.53	14.27	9.53	17.48	24.61	12.7	30.96	38.89	46.02	52.37	59.54
26″	660.4	7.92	12.7		9.53			12.7
28″	711.2	7.92	12.7	15.88	9.53			12.7

API 5CT L80 casing TubingDimensions and Masses for Standard Casing and for Casing Threaded with
API Round Thread and Buttress Thread
Labels a							Calculated Mass c
			Nominal Linear Mass T& C b,c	Wall Thick- ness				em, Mass Gain or Loss Due to End Finishing d
		Outside Diameter			Inside Diameter	Drift Diameter	Plain- end	kg
								Round Thread		Buttress Thread
							wpe
		D	kg/m	t	D	mm	kg/m	Short	Long	RC	SCC
		mm		mm	mm
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
4 1/2	9.5	114.3	14.38	5.21	103.88	100.7	14.02	3.64	—	— 4.53	— 1.12
4 1/2	10.5	114.3	15.73	5.69	102.92	99.74	15.24	3.33	— 3.61	4.32	0.91
4 1/2	11.6	114.3	17.38	6.35	101.6	98.42	16.91	3.18	3.35	4.07	0.6
4 1/2	13.5	114.3	19.87	7.37	99.56	96.38	19.44	—	3.53	3.64	0.24
4 1/2	15.1	114.3	22.69	8.56	97.18	94	22.32	—
5	11.5	127	17.19	5.59	115.82	112.64	16.74	4.32	— 4.85	— 5.38	— 1.24
5	13	127	19.69	6.43	114.14	110.96	19.12	4	4.51	4.99	0.61
5	15	127	22.69	7.52	111.96	108.78	22.16	3.71	4.52	4.4	0.22
5	18	127	27.19	9.19	108.62	105.44	26.7	—	3.45	3.76	–0.62
5	21.4	127	32.13	11.1	104.8	101.62	31.73	—	3.15	3.42	–0.96
5	23.2	127	34.76	12.14	102.72	99.54	34.39	—	2.99	3.23	–1.14
5	24.1	127	36.15	12.7	101.6	98.42	35.8	—
5 1/2	14	139.7	20.91	6.2	127.3	124.12	20.41	4.6	— 5.26	— 5.71	— 0.87
5 1/2	15.5	139.7	23.48	6.98	125.74	122.56	22.85	4.36	5.31	5.41	0.58
5 1/2	17	139.7	25.72	7.72	124.26	121.08	25.13	4.14	4.5	4.84	0.45
5 1/2	20	139.7	30.05	9.17	121.36	118.18	29.52	—	4.37	4.31	-0.52
5 1/2	23	139.7	34.05	10.54	118.62	115.44	33.57	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	26.8	139.7	40.15	12.7	114.3	111.12	39.78	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	29.7	139.7	44.47	14.27	111.16	107.98	44.14	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	32.6	139.7	48.74	15.88	107.94	104.76	48.49	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	35.3	139.7	52.8	17.45	104.8	101.62	52.61	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	38	139.7	56.82	19.05	101.6	98.42	56.68	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	40.5	139.7	60.64	20.62	98.46	95.28	60.55	—	—	—	—
5 1/2	43.1	139.7	64.41	22.22	95.26	92.08	64.38	—
6 5/8	20	168.28	29.76	7.32	153.64	150.46	29.06	5.58	6.23	6.35	0.89
6 5/8	24	168.28	35.72	8.94	150.4	147.22	35.13	4.42	5.48	5.52	0.68
6 5/8	28	168.28	41.67	10.59	147.1	143.92	41.18	—	4.73	4.71	–0.75
6 5/8	32	168.28	47.62	12.06	144.16	140.98	46.46	—	4.73	4	–1.46

casing pipe,casing well pipe, casing supreme pipe, casing vs carrier pipe, casing for ac pipe, casing steel pipe, casing pipe size, casing pvc pipe price, casing pipe, casing pipe suppliers in China, casing capping pipe, casing drill pipe,carrier pipe,casing pipe size,bushing Flange,bushing sleeve,bushing,bushing arm,bushing bearing,bushing Reducer,bushing tool,bushing pvc,bushing meaningThe cost of ERW pipes is generally lower compared to seamless pipes. This is primarily due to the difference in manufacturing processes. ERW pipes are made by Welding, which is a relatively simpler and less expensive process compared to the complex and time-consuming process of manufacturing seamless pipes. The cost savings in manufacturing are then passed on to the customers, making ERW pipes a more affordable option.

Another factor that contributes to the lower cost of ERW pipes is the availability of raw materials. ERW pipes can be made from a wide range of materials, including Carbon steel, Stainless steel, and Alloy steel. These materials are readily available and can be sourced at a lower cost compared to the specialized alloys required for seamless pipes. The availability and affordability of raw materials further contribute to the cost advantage of ERW pipes.

However, it is important to note that the cost difference between ERW and seamless pipes may vary depending on the specific requirements of the project. Factors such as pipe size, Wall thickness, and Material grade can influence the overall cost. In some cases, the cost of seamless pipes may be comparable to or even lower than that of ERW pipes, especially for smaller sizes or higher-grade materials.

Chemical Composition, Mass Fraction (%)
Grade		C		Mn		Mo		Cr		Ni	Cu	P	S	Si
	Type	min	max	min	max	min	max	min	max	max	max	max	max	max
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
H40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	—
J55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	—
K55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	—
N80	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	0.03	—
N80	Q	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	0.03	—
R95	—	—	0.45 c	—	1.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03	0.03	0.45
L80	1	—	0.43 a	—	1.9	—	—	—	—	0.25	0.35	0.03	0.03	0.45
L80	9Cr	—	0.15	0.3	0.6	0.9	1.1	8	10	0.5	0.25	0.02	0.03	1
L80	13Cr	0.15	0.22	0.25	1	—	—	12	14	0.5	0.25	0.02	0.03	1
C90	1	—	0.35	—	1.2	0.25 b	0.85	—	1.5	0.99	—	0.02	0.03	—
T95	1	—	0.35	—	1.2	0.25 b	0.85	0.4	1.5	0.99	—	0.02	0.03	—
C110	—	—	0.35	—	1.2	0.25	1	0.4	1.5	0.99	—	0.02	0.03	—
P110	e	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.030 e	0.030 e	—
Q125	1	—	0.35		1.35	—	0.85	—	1.5	0.99	—	0.02	0.01	—
NOTE Elements shown shall be reported in product analysis.
a The carbon content for L80 may be increased up to 0.50 % maximum if the product is Oil-quenched or polymer-quenched.
b The molybdenum content for Grade C90 Type 1 has no minimum tolerance if the wall thickness is less than 17.78 mm.
c The carbon content for R95 may be increased up to 0.55 % maximum if the product is oil-quenched.
d The molybdenum content for T95 Type 1 may be decreased to 0.15 % minimum if the wall thickness is less than 17.78 mm.
e For EW Grade P110, the phosphorus content shall be 0.020 % maximum and the sulfur content 0.010 % maximum.

Additionally, it is essential to consider the long-term cost implications when choosing between ERW and seamless pipes. While ERW pipes may have a lower upfront cost, they may require more frequent maintenance and replacement due to their welded seam. The welded seam can be a weak point in the pipe, making it more susceptible to corrosion and failure over time. On the other hand, seamless pipes, with their absence of a welded seam, offer better durability and longevity, potentially reducing the long-term cost of maintenance and replacement.